fukushimainform.ca - Gamma Spectroscopy









Search Preview

Gamma Spectroscopy | Home

fukushimainform.ca
What do we detect and how do we quantify radioactive cesium isotopes?  InFORM is measuring two radioactive isotopes, cesium-134 (134Cs) and cesium-137 (137Cs) that were released by the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. While these two isotopes have the same number of protons, they differ by 3 atomic mass units due to…
.ca > fukushimainform.ca

SEO audit: Content analysis

Language Error! No language localisation is found.
Title Gamma Spectroscopy | Home
Text / HTML ratio 36 %
Frame Excellent! The website does not use iFrame solutions.
Flash Excellent! The website does not have any flash contents.
Keywords cloud detector gamma photons sample crystal germanium energy number InFORM photon spectrometer calibration radioactive cesium Report isotopes standard results Fukushima current
Keywords consistency
Keyword Content Title Description Headings
detector 21
gamma 17
photons 17
sample 12
crystal 11
germanium 9
Headings
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
4 0 2 0 0 0
Images We found 8 images on this web page.

SEO Keywords (Single)

Keyword Occurrence Density
detector 21 1.05 %
gamma 17 0.85 %
photons 17 0.85 %
sample 12 0.60 %
crystal 11 0.55 %
germanium 9 0.45 %
energy 9 0.45 %
number 8 0.40 %
InFORM 7 0.35 %
photon 7 0.35 %
spectrometer 7 0.35 %
calibration 6 0.30 %
radioactive 6 0.30 %
cesium 6 0.30 %
Report 5 0.25 %
isotopes 5 0.25 %
standard 5 0.25 %
results 5 0.25 %
Fukushima 5 0.25 %
current 5 0.25 %

SEO Keywords (Two Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density
of the 13 0.65 %
the detector 11 0.55 %
in the 9 0.45 %
gamma photons 7 0.35 %
number of 7 0.35 %
the sample 6 0.30 %
in a 5 0.25 %
the number 5 0.25 %
germanium crystal 5 0.25 %
with the 4 0.20 %
gamma spectrometer 4 0.20 %
crystal and 4 0.20 %
the new 4 0.20 %
the instrument 4 0.20 %
the germanium 4 0.20 %
the gamma 4 0.20 %
the crystal 4 0.20 %
from the 4 0.20 %
from a 3 0.15 %
a sample 3 0.15 %

SEO Keywords (Three Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
the number of 4 0.20 % No
to share on 3 0.15 % No
photons that strike 3 0.15 % No
in the detector 3 0.15 % No
in new window 3 0.15 % No
Click to share 3 0.15 % No
the germanium crystal 3 0.15 % No
Opens in new 3 0.15 % No
number of photons 2 0.10 % No
the gamma photon 2 0.10 % No
known amounts of 2 0.10 % No
and reduces the 2 0.10 % No
National Acadamies Report 2 0.10 % No
the gamma photons 2 0.10 % No
the crystal and 2 0.10 % No
the detector for 2 0.10 % No
gamma photons detected 2 0.10 % No
that strike the 2 0.10 % No
learned from Fukushima 2 0.10 % No
– National Acadamies 2 0.10 % No

SEO Keywords (Four Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
Opens in new window 3 0.15 % No
Click to share on 3 0.15 % No
the number of photons 2 0.10 % No
in the detector for 2 0.10 % No
for Other Radionuclides WHOI 2 0.10 % No
Methods for Other Radionuclides 2 0.10 % No
photons that strike the 2 0.10 % No
lessons learned from Fukushima 2 0.10 % No
of the gamma photons 2 0.10 % No
learned from Fukushima Part 2 0.10 % No
– National Acadamies Report 2 0.10 % No
Safety lessons learned from 2 0.10 % No
Other Radionuclides WHOI CMER 2 0.10 % No
window Click to share 2 0.10 % No
new window Click to 2 0.10 % No
in new window Click 2 0.10 % No
with known amounts of 2 0.10 % No
of 134Cs and 137Cs 2 0.10 % No
efficiency are also independently verified using a 1 0.05 % No
These are the values 1 0.05 % No

Internal links in - fukushimainform.ca

About
About the InFORM Network | Home
InFORMal E-News
InFORMal E-News | Home
InFORM Scientists
InFORM Scientists | Home
InFORMal Scientists
InFORMal Scientists | Home
InFORMal Science Photos
Citizen Science | Home
Partners
Our NGO Partners | Home
InFORM Monitoring
Monitoring | Home
Methods
Methods | Home
Citizen Science
Citizen Science | Home
Gamma Spectroscopy
Gamma Spectroscopy | Home
Marine Biota Monitoring
Marine Biota Monitoring | Home
Biota
Biota | Home
Oceanic
Oceanic | Home
Coastal
Coastal | Home
Archived Results
Archived Monitoring Results | Home
Radiation Research
Peer Reviewed | Home
By Location
Location | Home
Japan
Japan | Home
Fukushima
Fukushima | Home
NW Pacific
NW Pacific | Home
N Pacific
N Pacific | Home
NE Pacific
NE Pacific | Home
British Columbia
British Columbia | Home
North America
North America | Home
Chernobyl
Chernobyl | Home
By Sample Type
Sample type | Home
Algae
Algae | Home
Atmospheric
Atmospheric | Home
Human
Humans | Home
Marine Life
Marine Life | Home
Model
Model | Home
Plants & Fungi
Plants | Home
Seawater
Seawater | Home
Sediment
Sediment | Home
By Isotope
Isotope | Home
Cesium
Cesium | Home
Iodine
Iodine | Home
Plutonium
Plutonium | Home
Polonium
Polonium | Home
Potassium
Potassium | Home
Strontium
Strontium | Home
Tellurium
Tellurium | Home
Uranium
Uranium | Home
Xenon
Xenon | Home
Presentations & Media
Presentations & Media | Home
Presentations
Presentations | Home
Media
Media | Home
Interviews
Interviews | Home
Resources
Resources | Home
InFORMing Research
InFORMing Research | Home
FAQ
FAQ | Home
Radiological Monitoring at the Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada
Radiological Monitoring at the Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada | Home
Health Canada Observations Post-Disaster
Aerosol and Noble Gas Radioactivity Measurements during the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident | Home
Canadian Radiological Monitoring Network
The Canadian Radiological Monitoring Network – Airborne Radioactivity | Home
Friday the 13th was the Luckiest Day Ever
Friday the 13th was the Luckiest Day Ever | Home
Into the Storm
Into the Storm | Home

Fukushimainform.ca Spined HTML


Gamma Spectroscopy | Home Home Search Primary Menu Skip to content About InFORMal E-News InFORM Scientists InFORMal Scientists InFORMal Science Photos Partners InFORM Monitoring InFORMal E-News Methods Citizen Science Gamma Spectroscopy Marine Biota Monitoring Methods for Other Radionuclides (WHOI CMER) Biota Oceanic Coastal Archived Results Radiation Research By Location Japan Fukushima NW Pacific N Pacific NE Pacific British Columbia North America Chernobyl By Sample Type Algae Atmospheric Human Marine Life Model Plants & Fungi Seawater Sediment By Isotope Cesium Iodine Plutonium Polonium Potassium Strontium Tellurium Uranium Xenon Presentations & Media Presentations Media Interviews Resources InFORMing Research FAQ Radiological Monitoring at the Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada IAEA Inter-laboratory Comparison Report 2014-2016 Official IAEA Report on the Fukushima Daiichi Accident UNSCEAR 2017 Report on Levels and Effects of Radiation Exposure Methods for Other Radionuclides (WHOI CMER) Safety lessons learned from Fukushima: Part 1 – National Acadamies Report Safety lessons learned from Fukushima: Part 2 – National Acadamies Report Health Canada Observations Post-Disaster Canadian Radiological Monitoring Network Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials Guidelines Search for: Gamma Spectroscopy What do we snift and how do we quantify radioactive cesium isotopes?  InFORM is measuring two radioactive isotopes, cesium-134 (134Cs) and cesium-137 (137Cs) that were released by the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. While these two isotopes have the same number of protons, they differ by 3 two-bit mass units due to 3 increasingly neutrons in 137Cs. Both isotopes emit gamma photons as they (or their daughter isotopes) undergo radioactive decay. Gamma rays are pure electromagnetic radiation.Increasinglyenergetic than x-rays, gamma photons emitted during waste penetrate some materials. Since the structure and energy levels of each isotope are unique, the gamma photon energy emitted during 137Cs waste is variegated from that of 134Cs decay, and from the energy of other radioisotopes. As a result, we use this energy ‘fingerprint’ to identify which radionuclide is emitting the gamma photon. Each photon from a sample is ejected from the whit and, if in a detector, may interact with a semi-conducive germanium whit (Ge). If you count the number of photons interacting at each energy level over a period of time in the detector, it is possible to determine the number, and type, of radioactive atoms in a sample.  What does a gamma detector squint like? A disassembled germanium detector with exposed germanium crystal and electrical connections through which the voltage gradient is applied. This gamma spectrometer has been taken untied so that you may see the large crystal of pure germanium metal and two electrodes inside. When a photon hits the crystal, it produces a tiny electrical current. The electrons move in the large voltage gradient within the crystal and the tiny current flows through the electrodes to an amplifier. The amplifier increases the signal strength and converts this to a stable, digital, voltage signal. Each gamma photon produces one pulse matching to a wink of light from one pixel of a lamina phone. Two important parts of the detector, not shown in the photo, are the sealed vacuum and the ‘cold finger’.  The vacuum surrounds the crystal and stabilizes the firsthand environment virtually the detector, prevents sparks, and reduces the preliminaries electrical current in the crystal.  The cryogenic cooling system, or ‘cold finger’, is a rod of copper metal inside the vacuum system immersed in a container full of liquid nitrogen, at -196 oC. This cooling system extends unelevated the detector crystal and reduces the electrical current that leaks wideness the crystal. If the germanium crystal were allowed to warm up to room temperature, leaking current would produce a very upper number of erroneous counts, or preliminaries counts, that are not from the sample. The worthiness to distinguish photons of cesium from other radioisotopes is moreover lost at room temperature. The assembled gamma spectrometer with a sample in the germanium detector and surrounded by thick shielding. The gamma detector, withal with the sample to be measured, are placed inside a large cylinder mostly made of lead with 10 cm thick walls. This thick, dense, metal shields the detector from any gamma photons generated by materials outside the box. What is seen during a measurement? Given the low levels of radioactivity that we have been observing in the samples of seawater and fish, each individual sample needs to be in the detector for 1-3 days to get an well-judged measure of the radioactive cesium present. After that time, we have counted unbearable photons to determine if 137Cs and/or 134Cs are present and in what concentration. Gamma energy spectrum from a 137Cs standard used for calibration. The peak at 661.7 keV has the highest detection in the sample (top). However, even in a standard, other isotopes can be unmistakably identified by the instrument (bottom). The vertical, or ‘y’, turning on both plots is a logorithmic scale of the number of gamma photons detected. The horizontal, or ‘x’, turning indicates the energy of the gamma photons detected. Photon energy increases to the right of the plot. The detector records all of the gamma photons that strike the germanium crystal in an energy spectrum (above). The peak shown is from 137Cs photons emitted from a standard used in scale that was in the detector for 26 hours. In the lower panel, you can moreover see highlighted energies from gamma photons of other isotopes that hit the detector during the sample run. These photons, from potassium-40 (K-40)  and lead (Pb-214), for example, are at higher and lower energies than the 137Cs photons.  How do you summate the value of Cesium-137 in a sample? The spectrometer counts the photons that strike the detector and records the energies. Using this information we determine the number of photons from each isotope. However, many cesium photons do not strike the detector. We use a ‘standard’ sample, with known amounts of 134Cs and 137Cs, to worth for this difference by  determining the fraction of cesium photons that strike vs miss the detector. Using this detector unperformed efficiency, we summate the total number of 134Cs and 137Cs atoms in the sample. These are the values reported on the InFORM website. To validate our findings, calculations of efficiency are also independently verified using a numerical model of cesium photon behaviour. How do you calibrate a new gamma spectrometer? To alimony pace with the number of samples generated over the elapsing of the InFORM project, a new gamma spectrometer was purchased. This particular detector was chosen in part considering of its well-shaped germanium crystal that powerfully surrounds the sample. This geometry increases the sensitivity of the instrument and lowers the minimum detection threshold. Comparison between the results of the InFORM gamma spectrometer and the known values of the standard reference materials. The expected value is visionless blue, the winning range is lighter blue. Values from the spectrometer (black) must overlap with the lighter undecorous region within the realm of error (black whiskers) for proper calibration. After setting up the instrument, the manufacturer works with the new operators on site for a week, or more, to explain the nuances of the new machine. In the specimen of this specific detector, the size of the germanium crystal is rather unique and posed some challenges. The manufacturer unfurled to work with the scientists at U Ottawa to tune the hardware and software to properly resolve the radioactive standard reference materials (SRMs) to within the diamond specifications for verism and precision. At the University of Ottawa Advanced Research Complex, we use SRMs that range from water that has been spiked with known amounts of radioactivity to spinach grown near Chernobyl that has a upper and well specified Cs-137 signal. In the figure, you can see whilom how well we matched up with these SRMs that were produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and ensure scale over a range of photon energies and radionuclide concentrations. This scale process is not straight forward and many iterations are necessary to troubleshoot challenges as they arise. However, once completed, the instrument should remain stable and only require validation of scale periodically every other month. In wing to the international standards, InFORM scientists cross-calibrated the new detector with other detectors used to produce results for our monitoring program. The cross-calibration is washed-up by analyzing the same sample on multiple detectors, comparing the results, and resolving differences. Through this iterative process we ensure that the new spectrometer meets international standards and all results from it are directly comparable to existing results from other aspects of the research program. Advertisements Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... View Fukushima-InFORM-257383817784613’s profile on FacebookView @FukushimaInFORM’s profile on TwitterView UCRqxVIr3s5Yc-djXahyBunA’s profile on YouTube Recent Posts Voyage Reflections Friday the 13th was the Luckiest Day Ever Into the Storm Advertisements Funded by Blog at WordPress.com. Post to Cancel Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By standing to use this website, you stipulate to their use. To find out more, including how to tenancy cookies, see here: Cookie Policy %d bloggers like this: