fukushimainform.ca









Search Preview

Home

fukushimainform.ca
Fukushima InFORM is an academic research effort monitoring the arrival of Fukushima contamination in Canadian waters.
.ca > fukushimainform.ca

SEO audit: Content analysis

Language Error! No language localisation is found.
Title Home
Text / HTML ratio 35 %
Frame Excellent! The website does not use iFrame solutions.
Flash Excellent! The website does not have any flash contents.
Keywords cloud Bq Fukushima InFORM concentrations Monitoring August Report m3 Pacific salmon samples InFORMal trend View Radiation Facebook Follow plume Health profile
Keywords consistency
Keyword Content Title Description Headings
Bq 9
Fukushima 7
InFORM 6
concentrations 6
Monitoring 6
August 5
Headings
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
6 0 0 0 0 0
Images We found 5 images on this web page.

SEO Keywords (Single)

Keyword Occurrence Density
Bq 9 0.45 %
Fukushima 7 0.35 %
InFORM 6 0.30 %
concentrations 6 0.30 %
Monitoring 6 0.30 %
August 5 0.25 %
Report 5 0.25 %
m3 4 0.20 %
Pacific 4 0.20 %
salmon 4 0.20 %
samples 4 0.20 %
InFORMal 4 0.20 %
trend 3 0.15 %
View 3 0.15 %
Radiation 3 0.15 %
Facebook 3 0.15 %
Follow 3 0.15 %
plume 3 0.15 %
Health 3 0.15 %
profile 3 0.15 %

SEO Keywords (Two Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density
of the 5 0.25 %
Bq m3 4 0.20 %
the Fukushima 4 0.20 %
from the 3 0.15 %
InFORM on 3 0.15 %
on Facebook 3 0.15 %
Follow InFORM 3 0.15 %
profile on 3 0.15 %
InFORMal ENews 2 0.10 %
learned from 2 0.10 %
Bq kg1 2 0.10 %
Facebook Follow 2 0.10 %
concentrations are 2 0.10 %
Acadamies Report 2 0.10 %
National Acadamies 2 0.10 %
– National 2 0.10 %
Fukushima Part 2 0.10 %
from Fukushima 2 0.10 %
lessons learned 2 0.10 %
WHOI CMER 2 0.10 %

SEO Keywords (Three Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
Follow InFORM on 3 0.15 % No
from Fukushima Part 2 0.10 % No
the Alaska Gyre 2 0.10 % No
lessons learned from 2 0.10 % No
learned from Fukushima 2 0.10 % No
Facebook Follow InFORM 2 0.10 % No
on Facebook Follow 2 0.10 % No
InFORM on Facebook 2 0.10 % No
– National Acadamies 2 0.10 % No
National Acadamies Report 2 0.10 % No
Radionuclides WHOI CMER 2 0.10 % No
Other Radionuclides WHOI 2 0.10 % No
for Other Radionuclides 2 0.10 % No
Methods for Other 2 0.10 % No
Safety lessons learned 2 0.10 % No
63 Bq m3 were 1 0.05 % No
offshore Peak concentrations 1 0.05 % No
the highest concentrations 1 0.05 % No
highest concentrations of 1 0.05 % No
concentrations of the 1 0.05 % No

SEO Keywords (Four Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
lessons learned from Fukushima 2 0.10 % No
for Other Radionuclides WHOI 2 0.10 % No
Safety lessons learned from 2 0.10 % No
learned from Fukushima Part 2 0.10 % No
Facebook Follow InFORM on 2 0.10 % No
on Facebook Follow InFORM 2 0.10 % No
InFORM on Facebook Follow 2 0.10 % No
– National Acadamies Report 2 0.10 % No
Follow InFORM on Facebook 2 0.10 % No
Methods for Other Radionuclides 2 0.10 % No
Other Radionuclides WHOI CMER 2 0.10 % No
west of Vancouver These 1 0.05 % No
of Vancouver These concentrations 1 0.05 % No
Vancouver These concentrations are 1 0.05 % No
These concentrations are double 1 0.05 % No
double what was concurrently 1 0.05 % No
concentrations are double what 1 0.05 % No
are double what was 1 0.05 % No
km due west of 1 0.05 % No
what was concurrently measured 1 0.05 % No

Internal links in - fukushimainform.ca

About
About the InFORM Network | Home
InFORMal E-News
InFORMal E-News | Home
InFORM Scientists
InFORM Scientists | Home
InFORMal Scientists
InFORMal Scientists | Home
InFORMal Science Photos
Citizen Science | Home
Partners
Our NGO Partners | Home
InFORM Monitoring
Monitoring | Home
Methods
Methods | Home
Citizen Science
Citizen Science | Home
Gamma Spectroscopy
Gamma Spectroscopy | Home
Marine Biota Monitoring
Marine Biota Monitoring | Home
Biota
Biota | Home
Oceanic
Oceanic | Home
Coastal
Coastal | Home
Archived Results
Archived Monitoring Results | Home
Radiation Research
Peer Reviewed | Home
By Location
Location | Home
Japan
Japan | Home
Fukushima
Fukushima | Home
NW Pacific
NW Pacific | Home
N Pacific
N Pacific | Home
NE Pacific
NE Pacific | Home
British Columbia
British Columbia | Home
North America
North America | Home
Chernobyl
Chernobyl | Home
By Sample Type
Sample type | Home
Algae
Algae | Home
Atmospheric
Atmospheric | Home
Human
Humans | Home
Marine Life
Marine Life | Home
Model
Model | Home
Plants & Fungi
Plants | Home
Seawater
Seawater | Home
Sediment
Sediment | Home
By Isotope
Isotope | Home
Cesium
Cesium | Home
Iodine
Iodine | Home
Plutonium
Plutonium | Home
Polonium
Polonium | Home
Potassium
Potassium | Home
Strontium
Strontium | Home
Tellurium
Tellurium | Home
Uranium
Uranium | Home
Xenon
Xenon | Home
Presentations & Media
Presentations & Media | Home
Presentations
Presentations | Home
Media
Media | Home
Interviews
Interviews | Home
Resources
Resources | Home
InFORMing Research
InFORMing Research | Home
FAQ
FAQ | Home
Radiological Monitoring at the Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada
Radiological Monitoring at the Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada | Home
Health Canada Observations Post-Disaster
Aerosol and Noble Gas Radioactivity Measurements during the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident | Home
Canadian Radiological Monitoring Network
The Canadian Radiological Monitoring Network – Airborne Radioactivity | Home
Friday the 13th was the Luckiest Day Ever
Friday the 13th was the Luckiest Day Ever | Home
Into the Storm
Into the Storm | Home

Fukushimainform.ca Spined HTML


Home Home Search Primary Menu Skip to content About InFORMal E-News InFORM Scientists InFORMal Scientists InFORMal Science Photos Partners InFORM Monitoring InFORMal E-News Methods Citizen Science Gamma Spectroscopy Marine Biota Monitoring Methods for Other Radionuclides (WHOI CMER) Biota Oceanic Coastal Archived Results Radiation Research By Location Japan Fukushima NW Pacific N Pacific NE Pacific British Columbia North America Chernobyl By Sample Type Algae Atmospheric Human Marine Life Model Plants & Fungi Seawater Sediment By Isotope Cesium Iodine Plutonium Polonium Potassium Strontium Tellurium Uranium Xenon Presentations & Media Presentations Media Interviews Resources InFORMing Research FAQ Radiological Monitoring at the Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada IAEA Inter-laboratory Comparison Report 2014-2016 Official IAEA Report on the Fukushima Daiichi Accident UNSCEAR 2017 Report on Levels and Effects of Radiation Exposure Methods for Other Radionuclides (WHOI CMER) Safety lessons learned from Fukushima: Part 1 – National Acadamies Report Safety lessons learned from Fukushima: Part 2 – National Acadamies Report Health Canada Observations Post-Disaster Canadian Radiological Monitoring Network Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials Guidelines Search for: Explore InFORM Monitoring Data In Depth: Current status: Coastal monitoring: Citizen science monitoring data from August and September 2017 are now available online (excepting three September samples still in process). These data protract the slow upward trend in cesium-137 concentrations that began in February 2015, when a coastal sample first tested positive for the Fukushima fingerprint isotope, cesium-134. The highest concentration from these two months was 3.5 Becquerels per cubic meter (Bq m-3, 1 Bq = 1 Becquerel is one radioactive waste per second, named without Henri Becquerel who discovered radioactivity) placid from Sandspit, Haida Gwaii on August 31. Read the full March update -> Biotic Monitoring: Extended testing of select 2016 salmon samples has identified the Fukushima-fingerprint isotope in one sample re-measured older this year.  The maximum level of contamination observed in a sample  (134Cs: 0.07 Bq kg-1, 137Cs: 0.51 Bq kg-1) is over 1,700 times lower than the Health Canada Action Level (1,000 Bq kg-1) and is not known to be a health risk for either humans or the environment. These results are an update to the 2016 results for salmon and shellfish. Last fall, 90 salmon were sampled from hatcheries and donated from our First Nations partners virtually BC and Yukon. These samples are currently undergoing testing and we visualize results to be misogynist later this winter or early spring. Shellfish sampling moreover unfurled from ten aquaculture and traditional harvest locations in 2017. These samples will be processed when the analyses on the salmon are complete. Oceanic Monitoring:  Data from August 2016 research cruises show that the highest concentrations of the Fukushima contamination plume remain offshore. Peak concentrations of 6.3 Bq m-3 were measured along Line P nearly 1000 km due west of Vancouver. These concentrations are double what was meantime measured in coastal waters.Remoterout, towards Station Papa at 50 N 145 W, concentrations are lower which indicates the the part-way of the Alaska Gyre and outside of the main spritz from the North Pacific Current. Based on a comparison of the peak concentrations sampled withal Line P between August 2015 (9.3 Bq m-3), February 2016 (7.2 Bq m-3), and now August 2016 (6.3 Bq m-3) we see a decreasing trend. This trend indicates that peak signal from the Fukushima plume as has passed through Line P and remoter observations are resolving the when side of the plume and/or possibly recirculation from the Alaska Gyre. Read increasingly -> Interested in older samples? Check out our archive! Advertisements View Fukushima-InFORM-257383817784613’s profile on FacebookView @FukushimaInFORM’s profile on TwitterView UCRqxVIr3s5Yc-djXahyBunA’s profile on YouTube Recent Posts Voyage Reflections Friday the 13th was the Luckiest Day Ever Into the Storm Advertisements Funded byFollow InFORM on Facebook Follow InFORM on Facebook Follow InFORM on TwitterMy Tweets Create a self-ruling website or blog at WordPress.com. Post to Cancel Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By standing to use this website, you stipulate to their use. To find out more, including how to tenancy cookies, see here: Cookie Policy